gplx/scripts/templates/Ref_IVDR_PerfEval.wiki

37 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

{{RegDocument
| area_of_validity = EU
| scope = IVD
| document_type = Regulation Article Reference
| name = IVDR (EU) 2017/746 Article 56 & Annex XIII Part A: Performance Evaluation
| version = 2017/746
| source = https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32017R0746#d1e4774-1-1
| language = EN, DE, FR
| status = Current
| restricted_access = No
}}
Article 56 and Annex XIII Part A of the IVDR define the requirements for performance evaluation of IVDs. Performance evaluation is the IVD equivalent of clinical evaluation under the MDR.
== Summary ==
Manufacturers must demonstrate that their device achieves its intended performance through a systematic and planned process covering scientific validity, analytical performance, and clinical performance.
Key obligations:
* Article 56 Performance evaluation requirements and documentation
* Annex XIII Part A Performance evaluation plan (PEP) and performance evaluation report (PER)
The three pillars of performance evaluation:
* **Scientific validity** the association between the analyte and a clinical condition or physiological state
* **Analytical performance** the ability to correctly detect or measure a particular analyte (sensitivity, specificity, precision, etc.)
* **Clinical performance** the ability of the device to yield results correlated with a clinical condition in a defined target population
== Related documents ==
* [[In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Regulation (EU) 2017/746]] Parent document
[[Category:In Vitro Diagnostics]]
[[Category:Clinical]]
[[Category:Performance Evaluation]]